Smith v. Driver
Plaintiff: Bernard E. Smith
Defendant: Joe Driver
Case Number: 6:2007cv00287
Filed: August 15, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) petition for habeas corpus 2 is DENIED; action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, sua sponte, from the docket of the Court; 2) Jgm shall be entered contemporaneously w/ this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the named respondent. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell. (RBB)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Driver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Driver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard E. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?