Petty v. Rush et al

Petty v. Rush et al

Case Number:	6:2008cv00159
Filed:	May 23, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se
Presiding Judge:	Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2010	Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to STRIKE from the record Pettys filings docketed as Record Numbers 83 , 84 , 85 , 88 , 90 , 93 , and 96 . The Court will not consider these submissions and they will be hel d for naught. (2) The defendants Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is GRANTED. (3) Pettys Motion to Renew Request to Appoint Counsel 79 is DENIED as MOOT. (4) Pettys Motion for Leave to Renew Objections to P rior Orders 80 is DENIED as MOOT. (5) Pettys Motion for Leave to Renew Discovery Requests 81 is DENIED as MOOT. (6) Pettys Motion to Renew Rule 60(b) Motions 82 is DENIED as MOOT. (7) Pettys Motion Submitting Exhibits and Clarification to Supp ort Motion in Opposition 87 is DENIED as MOOT. (8) Pettys Motion to Stay Response 89 is DENIED as MOOT. (9) Pettys Motion for Extension of Time in which to file Response/ Reply to Defendants Motion to Dismiss 95 is DENIED as MOOT. (10) Pettys Motion and Opposition to and/or Objection to Defendants Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss 100 is DENIED as MOOT. (11) All constitutional claims as serted by Petty against the individually named federal defendants in their individual capaci ties are DISMISSED with prejudice. (12) This action [6:08-CV-159-GFVT] is DISMISSED with prejudice. (13) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the named defendants herein.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 5/4/2010. (JMB)cc: COR, Robert William Petty

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2010

Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to STRIKE from the record Pettys filings docketed as Record Numbers 83 , 84 , 85 , 88 , 90 , 93 , and 96 . The Court will not consider these submissions and they will be hel d for naught. (2) The defendants Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 77 is GRANTED. (3) Pettys Motion to Renew Request to Appoint Counsel 79 is DENIED as MOOT. (4) Pettys Motion for Leave to Renew Objections to P rior Orders 80 is DENIED as MOOT. (5) Pettys Motion for Leave to Renew Discovery Requests 81 is DENIED as MOOT. (6) Pettys Motion to Renew Rule 60(b) Motions 82 is DENIED as MOOT. (7) Pettys Motion Submitting Exhibits and Clarification to Supp ort Motion in Opposition 87 is DENIED as MOOT. (8) Pettys Motion to Stay Response 89 is DENIED as MOOT. (9) Pettys Motion for Extension of Time in which to file Response/ Reply to Defendants Motion to Dismiss 95 is DENIED as MOOT. (10) Pettys Motion and Opposition to and/or Objection to Defendants Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss 100 is DENIED as MOOT. (11) All constitutional claims as serted by Petty against the individually named federal defendants in their individual capaci ties are DISMISSED with prejudice. (12) This action [6:08-CV-159-GFVT] is DISMISSED with prejudice. (13) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the named defendants herein.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 5/4/2010. (JMB)cc: COR, Robert William Petty

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petty v. Rush et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?