Jones v. SSA
Plaintiff: Tammy S. Jones
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 6:2008cv00339
Filed: October 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Harlan
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION & ORDER: 1) Pla's Motion for Summary Judgment 6 is DENIED; 2) Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment 7 is GRANTED; 3) The administrative decision of the Commissioner will be AFFIRMED by a separate judgment entered this date. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 2/5/2010.(EHM)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy S. Jones
Represented By: Julie A. Atkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?