Jones v. Wilson

Jones v. Wilson

Plaintiff:	Patrick A. Jones
Defendant:	Eric Wilson
Case Number:	6:2009cv00235
Filed:	July 8, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	London Office
County:	McCreary
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se
Presiding Judge:	Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2009	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Petitioner Patrick A. Jones Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; (2) Respondents Motion for Order 11 is GRANTED; (3) Petitioners Motion for Reconsideration 15 is DENIED as meritless; (4) Petitioners Motio n for Discovery 16 is DENIED as MOOT; (5) this action will be DISMISSED; and (6) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the Respondent. Motions terminated: 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re [ 8] Memorandum Opinion & Order, by Patrick A. Jones MOTION for Reconsideration re 8 Memorandum Opinion & Order by Patrick A. Jones filed by Patrick A. Jones, 16 MOTION for Discovery by Patrick A. Jones filed by Patrick A. Jones, 11 MOTION for Order by Eric Wilson filed by Eric Wilson.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 12/17/2009.(JMB)cc: COR, Patrick A. Jones
October 1, 2009	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) All claims about the following incident reports are DISMISSED, sua sponte: Incident Report No. 1302709; Incident Report No. 1619547; Incident Report No. 1745223; and Incident Report No. 1720206; (2) The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of the Petition and this Order upon Respondent Warden Eric Wilson, the Attorney General for the United States, and the United States Attorney for the EDKY; (3) W/in 30 days of the DOE of this Order, the Resp ondent shall answer or otherwise defend Petitioners claims re Incident Report No. 1716824; (4) Upon entry of a Response herein or upon the expiration of said period of time, the Clerk of the Court shall notify the Pro Se Office; (5) The Petitioner sh all keep the Clerk of the Court informed of his current mailing address; and (6) For every further pleading or other document he wishes to submit for consideration by the court, the Petitioner shall serve upon the Respondent, or, if appearance has be en entered by counsel, upon the attorney, a copy of the pleading or other document. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/1/2009.(JMB)cc: COR, Patrick Jones, Warden Eric Wilson, USA for EDKY and Atty General for USA via certified mail w/ copy of Petition

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2009

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Petitioner Patrick A. Jones Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; (2) Respondents Motion for Order 11 is GRANTED; (3) Petitioners Motion for Reconsideration 15 is DENIED as meritless; (4) Petitioners Motio n for Discovery 16 is DENIED as MOOT; (5) this action will be DISMISSED; and (6) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order in favor of the Respondent. Motions terminated: 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re [ 8] Memorandum Opinion & Order, by Patrick A. Jones MOTION for Reconsideration re 8 Memorandum Opinion & Order by Patrick A. Jones filed by Patrick A. Jones, 16 MOTION for Discovery by Patrick A. Jones filed by Patrick A. Jones, 11 MOTION for Order by Eric Wilson filed by Eric Wilson.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 12/17/2009.(JMB)cc: COR, Patrick A. Jones

October 1, 2009

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) All claims about the following incident reports are DISMISSED, sua sponte: Incident Report No. 1302709; Incident Report No. 1619547; Incident Report No. 1745223; and Incident Report No. 1720206; (2) The Clerk of the Court shall serve by certified mail a copy of the Petition and this Order upon Respondent Warden Eric Wilson, the Attorney General for the United States, and the United States Attorney for the EDKY; (3) W/in 30 days of the DOE of this Order, the Resp ondent shall answer or otherwise defend Petitioners claims re Incident Report No. 1716824; (4) Upon entry of a Response herein or upon the expiration of said period of time, the Clerk of the Court shall notify the Pro Se Office; (5) The Petitioner sh all keep the Clerk of the Court informed of his current mailing address; and (6) For every further pleading or other document he wishes to submit for consideration by the court, the Petitioner shall serve upon the Respondent, or, if appearance has be en entered by counsel, upon the attorney, a copy of the pleading or other document. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/1/2009.(JMB)cc: COR, Patrick Jones, Warden Eric Wilson, USA for EDKY and Atty General for USA via certified mail w/ copy of Petition

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick A. Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?