Ark Land Company et al v. Harlan Lee Land, LLC et al
| Ark Land Company |
| Harlan Lee Land, LLC, Darrell G. Barnwell, Stephanie Barnwell McCarty, Billie J. Barnwell and Carolyn B. Petrey |
| 6:2010cv00009 |
| January 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Harlan |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs (collectively, Harlan Lee) filed a motion to compel concerning some of its document requests seeking the production of certain financial information. (D.E. 80 ). The motion is GRANTE D in part and DENIED in part. It is ORDERED that Harlan Lee's motion to compel (D.E. 80 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Within 10 days of the entry of this Order, Lone Mountain Processing, Inc. SHALL PRODUCE to Harlan Lee the documents set forth in this Order. Such production shall be made in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34. The Court understands that Ark Land has made privilege objections to each of the disputed discovery requests. Nothing herein precl udes Ark Land from continuing to maintain that any documents that would otherwise be discoverable are protected by the attorney-client or work-product privileges. Of course, such claims of privilege must be raised in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 10/31/2011. (RBB)cc: COR Modified on 10/31/2011 to add text "Opinion" (RBB).
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Ark Land's claims will be permitted to go forward at this stage. CRDERED that the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [R. 20 , 22 , 32 , 33 ] are DENIED. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 09/22/2010.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
