Hale v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
| United States Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 6:2010cv00013 |
| January 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Clay |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| Robert E. Wier |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The defendant's motion for summary judgment, R. 23 , is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, R. 21 , is DENIED Motions terminated: 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dorothy Hale filed by Dorothy Hale, 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment by United States Department of Veterans Affairs filed by United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/6/10.(SYH)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hale v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of Veterans Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Herbert Davis Sledd, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
