Griffin v. Lappin et al
| Odell Griffin |
| Harely G. Lappin, Eric Wilson and L. Gregory |
| 6:2010cv00049 |
| February 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Pro Se |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plaintiff Odell Griffins motion for relief from judgment [R. 43] is DENIED; and (2) The Clerk of this Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, referencing Case No. 10-5457. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 07/06/2011.(MRS)cc: COR, 6CCA Clerk
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) US' Mt to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is GRANTED; 2) Plf Odell Griffin's second mt to amend his Complaint 26 and his motions 34 and 36 seeking reconsideration of an e arlier Order denying him appt of counsel are DENIED as MOOT; 3) Griffin's Amended Complaint 12 asserting FTCA claims against the US is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously w/ this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Case Terminated. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 3/21/2011.(RBB)cc: COR (paper copy mailed to pro se party via US Mail.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
