X-Savage v. Wilson
Plaintiff: Dion E. X-Savage
Defendant: Eric D. Wilson
Case Number: 6:2010cv00165
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: McCreary
Presiding Judge: Pro Se
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Petitioner Dion X-Savages petition for writ of habeas corpus 2 is DENIED; 2. This action shall be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket; and 3. Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order in favor of Eric Wilson, the named Respondent.. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/10/2010.(JMB)cc: COR, Dion E. X-Savage
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: X-Savage v. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dion E. X-Savage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric D. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?