Coleman v. Samuels et al
| Monroe L. Coleman |
| Charles E. Samuels and Richard B. Ives |
| 6:2012cv00157 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| McCreary |
| PSO |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER:1. Coleman's motion for the Court to compel the Warden to inform him why he has not been scheduled for a parole hearing, given his revised PED, and his request that he be scheduled for a parole hearing in June of 2015 [R. 58 ] is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. Coleman's filing construed as a motion to order the Warden to advise him why he has not received certain Education Good Time Credit for obtaining his GED, his Paralegal Associate Degree, his Culinary Arts Trainin g, and other BOP Educational Good Time, Meritorious Good Time, and other statutory good time [R. 59] has no merit and is DENIED; 3. Respondent's motion to dismiss Coleman's § 2241 petition as moot [R. 61] is GRANTED IN PART, in respect to Coleman's claim that the BOP had erred in computing a PED of March 22, 2021, and in respect to Coleman's claim that he is entitled to be scheduled for his initial parole hearing; 4. Colemans remaining claim in his § 2241 petition t hat he is entitled to additional good time credit on his sentence than that awarded by the BOP is without merit and is DENIED; 5. Coleman's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [R. 1], as amended and supplemented, is DENIED, in part as moot and in part on the merits; 6. The Court will enter an appropriate judgment contemporaneously; and 7. This matter is STRICKEN from the active docket.)Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 8/24/2015.(RBB)cc: COR, paper copy to Monroe Coleman, via US Mail.
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Respondent in this action is Richard B. Ives, Warden at USP-McCreary. The Clerk is directed to term Charles E. Samuels as a named respondent. 2. The Warden is directed to file a respons e to Coleman's habeas petition. The Clerk shall prepare the documents necessary for services of process upon Coleman's custodian, Richard B. Ives, Warden, USP-McCreary, Pine Knot, KY. 4. The Clerk shall prepare a "Service Packet&quo t; consisting of the following for service of process upon the US: see a-d. 5. Add'ly, the Clerk shall make a copy of the a-d, with each set containing the following: See 5. a-d. 6. The Clerk shall present the Service Packet(s) and copies t o the USMS in London, KY. 7. Service of Process upon the Respondent, Richard B. Ives, Warden, shall be conducted by the USMS in London, KY, by serving a Service Packet personally upon him, thru arrangement w/FBOP. 8. The USMS must complete servi ce on teh named respondent by serving the copies described in paragraph 4 by certified or registered mail to: a. US Atty for EDKy; b. Office of the Atty General of US in Washington, D.C.; and c. one set to the Office of FBOP in Washington, D.C. 9. The petitioner SHALL: a. Immediately advice Clerk of any change in mailing address. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of case. b. Communicate w/the Court solely thru notices or motions filed with the Clerk's Office. The court wi ll disregard correspondence sent directly to judge's chambers. c. Certify in writing that he has mailed a copy to every dft and state the date of mailing. Court will disregard any notice or motion that doesn't contain certification. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 04/30/2013.(KJA)cc: COR, mailed paper copy to pro se filer Modified text on 4/30/2013 (KJA).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
