Currier v. First Resolution Investment Corp.

Plaintiff: Roslyn Currier
Defendant: First Resolution Investment Corp.
Case Number: 6:2012cv00223
Filed: November 14, 2012
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: London Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 3, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendant First Resolution Investment Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4 ) is hereby GRANTED; (2) This matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and stricken from the Court's active docket. Case Terminated. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 7/3/13.(SYD)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Currier v. First Resolution Investment Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roslyn Currier
Represented By: James R. McKenzie
Represented By: James Hays Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Resolution Investment Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.