Epling v. American United Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Donita Epling
Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 7:2008cv00002
Filed: January 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Pikeville Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Overturning Administrative Decision 16 is GRANTED; 2. Defendant may challenge Plaintiff's computation of LTD Benefits by 2/20/09. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 1/20/09.(MJY)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Epling v. American United Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donita Epling
Represented By: Kenneth W. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?