Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLC et al

Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLC et al

Plaintiff:	Richard C. Adler
Defendant:	Elk Glenn, LLC and Ricky Robinson Construction, Inc.
Case Number:	7:2012cv00085
Filed:	July 31, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Pikeville Office
County:	Knott
Presiding Judge:	Amul R. Thapar
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 17, 2013	Filing 109 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Elk Glenn's motion for s/j 72 is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. 2) Ricky Robinson's motion for s/j 81 is DENIED/. 3) Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company's motion for s/j 79 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/17/2013. (RKT) cc: COR
December 6, 2013	Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Elk Glenn's motion to exclude testimony of Vance Mosely and Joseph Cooke, R. 74 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Cooke may not testify about implications of septic tank's location. Mosely may not testify on matters related to his colleague's interview of banking and insurance representatives. (2) Ricky Robinson's motion to exclude testimony of Joseph Cooke, R. 82 , is DENIED. (3) Adler's motion to exclude testimony of Dixon Nunnery and James Goble, R. 80 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/6/2013. (TDA) cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

December 17, 2013

Filing 109 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Elk Glenn's motion for s/j 72 is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. 2) Ricky Robinson's motion for s/j 81 is DENIED/. 3) Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company's motion for s/j 79 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/17/2013. (RKT) cc: COR

December 6, 2013

Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Elk Glenn's motion to exclude testimony of Vance Mosely and Joseph Cooke, R. 74 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Cooke may not testify about implications of septic tank's location. Mosely may not testify on matters related to his colleague's interview of banking and insurance representatives. (2) Ricky Robinson's motion to exclude testimony of Joseph Cooke, R. 82 , is DENIED. (3) Adler's motion to exclude testimony of Dixon Nunnery and James Goble, R. 80 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/6/2013. (TDA) cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Elk Glenn, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ricky Robinson Construction, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard C. Adler
Represented By:	Joe F. Childers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?