Sergent et al v. ICG Knott County, LLC et al
| Jarrod Sergent and Linda Sergent |
| ICG Knott County, LLC, International Coal Group, Inc., ICG, Inc. of Delaware and Arch Coal, Inc. |
| 7:2012cv00118 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Letcher |
| Amul R. Thapar |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dfts motion for summary judgment, R. 34 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. (a) Arch is entitled to summary judgment on the Sergents negligence per se claim. (b) The Sergents negligence and spousal c onsortium claims may proceed to trial, but they may not recover emotional damages. (c) International Coal Group, Inc., and ICG, Inc. of Delaware, are both entitled to summary judgment and are DISMISSED from this case. (2) A telephone confer ence is SCHEDULED for Friday, December 13, 2013, at 11:00 a.m., to discuss the scheduling of trial. A court reporter is needed and will be provided by the Court. Counsel for Arch Coal, Inc., and the Sergents must DIAL IN to this conference call five minutes before the scheduled time by following these steps: See (a) - (c). Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 12/9/13. (MJY)cc: COR, Covington Court Diary
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
