Johnson v. White

Johnson v. White

Petitioner:	Donald Herb Johnson
Respondent:	Randy White
Case Number:	7:2014cv00117
Filed:	July 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	Pikeville Office
County:	Floyd
Presiding Judge:	Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2022	Filing 49 JUDGMENT: 1. Donald Herb Johnson's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28:2254 (R. 1 ) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 4. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/8/2022. (TDA) cc: COR
March 20, 2017	Filing 38 OPINION & ORDER: Petitioner Johnson's motion for discovery and anevidentiary hearing (DE 32 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will address his motion as if it were part of the habeas petition itself. If the Court finds that sta te court's determination of claims raised in Johnson's petition were either "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States," or "w[ere] based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding", Johnson will be able to renew the motion at that time. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/20/17. (MJY) cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2022

Filing 49 JUDGMENT: 1. Donald Herb Johnson's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28:2254 (R. 1 ) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 4. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/8/2022. (TDA) cc: COR

March 20, 2017

Filing 38 OPINION & ORDER: Petitioner Johnson's motion for discovery and anevidentiary hearing (DE 32 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will address his motion as if it were part of the habeas petition itself. If the Court finds that sta te court's determination of claims raised in Johnson's petition were either "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States," or "w[ere] based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding", Johnson will be able to renew the motion at that time. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/20/17. (MJY) cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald Herb Johnson
Represented By:	Euva D. Blandford
Represented By:	Dennis J. Burke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Randy White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?