Annabel #414234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
| Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II |
| Michael Martin, Willie Smith, Joseph Novak, Casey Cheney, Kevin Woods, C. Lewis, S. Ryske, L. Becher, Michigan Department of Corrections, John Christiansen and James E. Long |
| 1:2018cv00914 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ionia |
| Phillip J Green |
| Gordon J Quist |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Without Payment of Initial Fee - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II (clw)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without payment of an initial partial filing fee; plaintiff to remain liable for the filing fee as funds become available; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green, jkw)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (clw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (clw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
