Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Bonds v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11828
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Petitioner:
Demario D. Bonds
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Petersmark v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11464
Petitioner:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Respondent:
J. Christiansen, Hedi E. Washington and John Christiansen
Stead v. Morrison
as 2:2024cv11183
Petitioner:
Michael Stead
Respondent:
Warden John Christiansen, John Christiansen and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2024cv10551
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, John Christiansen and others
Hardaway et al v. Grandy II et al
as 2:2024cv10528
Plaintiff:
Carla Hardaway and Nyrand Hardaway
Defendant:
Colonel James F. Grandy II, Trooper John Christiansen, Trooper Unknown Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogan v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv10427
Petitioner:
Arron Demarcus Bogan
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson #505022 v. Christiansen
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Anderson #505022
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
