Manning v. Epps et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00256
Filed: April 25, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
Presiding Judge: W. Allen Pepper
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER denying 85 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/02/2010. (pbs, USDC)
December 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 82 Order and 83 Final Judgment. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 12/29/2009. (pbs, USDC)
December 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER denying 79 Motion for Expert Funds. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 12/08/2009. (pbs, USDC)
November 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 66 Motion for a scheduling order.Petitioner has until 1/02/2009 to file supplement to petition. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 11/03/2008. (pbs, USDC)
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 61 Motion to Produce evidence for DNA; denying 62 Motion to Appoint Expert; granting 63 Motion for permission to subpoena records. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 10/03/2008. (pbs, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manning v. Epps et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?