Northern District of Mississippi Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 13,086
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00091
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (District or BAP)
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Harrison-Reed v. Piggs et al
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff: Velma Harrison-Reed
Defendant: James B. Piggs , Mam-Zak, Inc. , John Doe Persons 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Vandygriff v. Keech
as 3:2018cv00118
Plaintiff: Jackey Vandygriff
Defendant: Randy Keech
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Bland v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00117
Plaintiff: Terry Bland
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rowan Family Dentistry, Inc. et al v. Medical Synergy, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00116
Plaintiff: Rowan Family Dentistry, Inc. , Martin Chiropractic, LLC
Defendant: Medical Synergy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Knight et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00115
Plaintiff: Sherry Knight , Darryl Knight
Defendant: Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Price v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Price
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rutledge and Davis, P.L.L.C. v. Dalmatian Fire Equipment, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00114
Plaintiff: Rutledge and Davis, P.L.L.C.
Defendant: Dalmatian Fire Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Anderson v. Turner et al
as 4:2018cv00107
Petitioner: Randy Anderson
Respondent: Marshal Turner, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copple v. Turner et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Petitioner: Daniel Paul Copple
Respondent: Marshal Turner, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?