US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,013
Withers v. City of Aberdeen
as 1:2024cv00218
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen
Plaintiff:
Tom Withers, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dilworth v. Boa Vida Hospital of Aberdeen, MS LLC
as 1:2024cv00219
Defendant:
Boa Vida Hospital of Aberdeen, MS LLC doing business as Monroe Regional Hospital
Plaintiff:
Heather Dilworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Bridgett et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Officer Carter, Officer Bridgett and Captain Rivera
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnies v. McNeil
as 4:2024cv00125
Defendant:
Walt McNeil
Plaintiff:
Lawton McKinnies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnies v. Banks et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Lawton McKinnies
Defendant:
Walt McNeil and "Unknown" Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway et al v. Harrison et al
as 3:2024cv00385
Defendant:
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc and Michael L. Harrison
Plaintiff:
Contrell Holloway and Melinda Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coahoma Community College v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Coahoma Community College
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
