Smith v. Lowndes County, Mississippi

Defendant: Lowndes County, Mississippi
Plaintiff: Nathan Smith, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00059
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Lowndes
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 8, 2014 45 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 37 Motion for Non-Suit Without Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/8/2014. (bkl)
April 8, 2014 46 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re 45 Order Granting Motion for Non-Suit Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/8/2014. (bkl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Lowndes County, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lowndes County, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Smith, Jr.
Represented By: Jim D. Waide, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.