White v. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)

Defendant: Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Plaintiff: Michael A. White
Case Number: 1:2013cv00071
Filed: April 5, 2013
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Lowndes
Presiding Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 10, 2013 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 12/10/2013. (psk)
December 10, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re 12 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 12/10/2013. (psk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael A. White
Represented By: Rodney A. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.