Davis v. United States of America

Plaintiff: W. E. Davis
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2011cv00034
Filed: February 18, 2011
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Office: Delta Division Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Referring Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1346
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 5, 2011 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER STAYING CASE pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss. Signed by Jane M Virden on 5/5/11. (ncb)
December 15, 2011 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Michael P. Mills on 12/15/2011. (lpm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: W. E. Davis
Represented By: John Thomas Lamar, Jr.
Represented By: John Thomas Lamar, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Steven Christopher Woodliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.