Roberson v. McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. et al
| Carrol D. Roberson |
| McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. and RATP Inc., Paris, France |
| 3:2014cv00168 |
| July 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| Lafayette |
| Neal B. Biggers |
| Jane M. Virden |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's claims are dismissed excluding claims for aggravated assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendants Calvin Hill and McDonald Transit.. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 5/23/16. (tab)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 11/20/15. (jww)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion to Compel. Within ten (10) days of this date, defendants shall produce all documents responsive to Request No. 4 above (as limited by the plaintiffs motion to compel with respect to audio/video recordings), including, but not limited to, audio/video records and insurance claim documents. However, if a continuance of the current trial setting is granted in this case, defendants shall have thirty (30) days from this date to produce this discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/21/15. (ncb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
