Judd et al v. State of Mississippi et al
| James Arthur Judd and The Estate of Kevin Bowens |
| State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, John Doe, John Jane Doe and Liability Insurers of Each Defendant |
| 4:2016cv00119 |
| June 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Chickasaw |
| Debra M. Brown |
| Jane M. Virden |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 4/5/18. (tab)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER STAYING CASE. Defendants shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/12/17. (bfg)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 10/6/17. (jtm)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 40 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/13/2017. (bbf)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; that State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections are dismissed. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 5/10/17. (tab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
