Watts v. Brewer
Plaintiff: Jimi Levar Watts
Defendant: Franklin Brewer
Case Number: 1:2008cv01490
Filed: January 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: George
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Memorandum Opinion and ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations: that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/26/2010.(avm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watts v. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimi Levar Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin Brewer
Represented By: Jim Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?