Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Haley v. Brewer et al
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Russell Francis Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer and Eddie Rogers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Brewer
as 23-60366
Petitioner / Appellant:
Russell Haley
Respondent / Appellee:
Franklin Brewer
BREWER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRANKLIN BREWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stubbs v. Jordan et al
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Cornell Leland Stubbs
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan, Joseph Cooley, Brand Huffman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs v. Jordan et al
as 2:2022cv03290
Plaintiff:
Cornell Stubbs and Cornell Leland Stubbs
Defendant:
Officer Jordan, Joseph Cooley, Brand Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Brewer
as 22-60398
Petitioner / Appellant:
Russell Haley
Respondent / Appellee:
Franklin Brewer
Stubbs v. Cain
as 22-60096
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cornell Stubbs
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Warden Franklin Brewer
Haley v. Brewer
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stubbs v. Cain et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Plaintiff:
Cornell Stubbs
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Warden Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nicole Hayes
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi , Franklin Brewer , Stone County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
