Poole v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Nathan Poole, Sr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2012cv00258
Filed: August 20, 2012
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Referring Judge: Robert H. Walker
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 11 motion for summary judgment is denied. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this order as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 5/13/13 (PKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poole v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Poole, Sr.
Represented By: Jack C. Pickett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.