Winding v. Sparkman et al
| James C. Winding |
| E.L. Sparkman, Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, Unknown Powe and Unknown Moore |
| 4:2008cv00059 |
| July 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Lauderdale |
| Linda R. Anderson |
| Henry T. Wingate |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
FINAL JUDGMENT Dismissing with prejudice as frivilous. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 5/7/10 (MGB)
|
|
Filing
53
OMNIBUS ORDER entered granting 33 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 36 Motion for medical attention; denying 37 Motion to Compel; denying 39 Motion for subpoenas; denying 43 Motion to Compel; denying 23 Motion to Amend; denying 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for TRO; denying 27 Motion to Compel; denying 29 Motion to Compel; denying 30 Motion to Amend. All motions to be filed on or before 9/21/09. On or before 8/12/09, all parties shall file written motions t o consolidate regarding all of Plaintiff's six cases filed in federal court. Plaintiff's ore tenus motion for the undersigned to recuse herself is GRANTED, and this case is hereby reassigned to Magistrate Judge James C. Sumner; the Clerk of the court shall alter the docket accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 7/28/09. (ACF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
