Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Edmond v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
Albert Edmond
Defendant:
Ronald King, E.L. Sparkman and Juanita Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Tew et al
as 3:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
S. Tew , R. Rice , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Tew et al
as 5:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
S. Tew , R. Rice , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Vincent et al
as 3:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Leonard Vincent, David Petrie, Joyce Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmond v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Albert Edmond
Defendant:
E.L. Sparkman, Ronald King and Connie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
C. Rutledge, J. Breakfield, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, E.L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Box et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ray
Defendant:
Alicia Box, E.L. Sparkman and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
