Gater v. Sullivan et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Lee Gater
Defendant: Bobby Sullivan, Rick Walter and Scott Horman
Case Number: 1:2015cv00003
Filed: January 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Scott
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 13 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Plaintiff Jerry Lee Gater motion is DENIED..IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending final disposition of the criminal charges against plaintiff in Unit ed States v. Gater, 1:15CR52 SNLJ (E.D.Mo.).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify this Court in writing concerning the final disposition of the criminal charges pending against him in United States v. Gater, 1:15CR52 SNLJ (E.D.Mo.).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is administratively closed pending final disposition of the criminal charges against plaintiff, and may be reopened by plaintiffs filing of a motion to reopen the case after final disposition. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/13/15. (MRS)
May 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 10 PRO SE MOTION plaintiff's 1983 claim should be stayed until the underlying criminal charges pending against plaintiff be resolved filed by Plaintiff Jerry Lee Gater. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's mo tion to extend the stay indefinitely [Doc. #10] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order why this case should not be either reopened or dismiss ed in its entirety given the culmination of the charges against plaintiff in State v. Gater, Case No. 14SO-CR01691-01 (Scott County Court). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to respond to this Memorandum and Order will result in a dismissal of this case without prejudice. (Response to Court due by 6/29/2015.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/28/15. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gater v. Sullivan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Lee Gater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Walter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Horman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?