Williams et al v. Tucker et al
| Donna Williams and Linda Jenkins |
| Frederick P. Tucker and Kevin Shoemaker |
| 2:2014cv00038 |
| April 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Macon |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion in limine regarding Missouri law 112 is denied except to the extent set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion in limine regarding "me too&quo t; evidence 119 is granted as to Donna Williams, and is granted as to Ted Harrell and David Moore only to the extent that plaintiff's counsel may not mention in the jury's presence any claim or evidence that Harrell and Moore were termin ated in retaliation for political activities until counsel has made a sufficient showing and the Court has ruled that the evidence may be admitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as set forth on the record at the final hearing, the trial in this matter will be bifurcated, with the trial set to begin on Monday December 18, 2017 to consider only the claim against defendant Tucker in his individual capacity. Trial on the official capacity claim will be scheduled after the verdict on the individual capacity claim and after the parties have an opportunity to fully brief plaintiff's request (made for the first time in the pretrial submissions) to ask a jury to impose money damages against Macon County, even though the pleadings only sought equitable relief against Frederick Tucker in his official capacity. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on December 15, 2017. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Frederick P. Tucker's motion for summary judgment [# 48 ] is granted as to the claims of plaintiff Donna Williams, and is denied as to the claims of plaintiff Linda Jenkins. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Kevin Shoemaker's motion for summary judgment [# 51 ] is granted on the basis of qualified immunity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions to strike affidavits and statement of facts [## [5 8], 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 74 ] are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will hold a telephone conference with counsel for plaintiff Jenkins and counsel for defendant Tucker on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. Plaintiffs counsel must place the call and have all necessary counsel on the line before calling my chambers at (314)244-7520. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/9/2015. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) For the reasons discussed herein, I conclude that Jenkins has properly stated a claim of First Amendment retaliation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that defendant Kevin Shoemaker's motion to dismiss [# 16 ] plaintiffs' amended complaint is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 02/05/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
