Halsey et al v. Casino One Corporation
||Linda Halsey and Marsha Booker
||Casino One Corporation
||September 7, 2012
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - County
||Catherine D. Perry
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 12, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification of a collective action and authorization to send notice of suit to potential opt-in plaintiffs [# 11 ] is GRANTED IN PART. The opt-in class will consist of all current or former employees of Casino One who worked as floor supervisors at Lumiere Casino during the period of the past three (3) years from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs may se nd their notice of suit, consistent with the revisions stated in this Order, to potential opt-in plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall provide plaintiffs' attorneys with a computer-readable data file containing the names, addres ses, and telephone numbers (if known) of potential opt-in plaintiffs within 30 days of the date of this Order. This case will be set for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by separate order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/12/2012. (CBL)
|December 12, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file second amended complaint [# 63 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on December 12, 2013. (BRP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.