PURZEL VIDEO GMBH v. DOES 1-44

Plaintiff: PURZEL VIDEO GMBH
Defendant: DOES 1-44
Case Number: 4:2012cv02015
Filed: October 29, 2012
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Adair
Presiding Judge: David D. Noce
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 25, 2013 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Doe 34's Motion to Quash 11 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Does 1-2, Does 4-17, 19-36, 37-39, 42-44 are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/25/13. (LAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PURZEL VIDEO GMBH v. DOES 1-44
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PURZEL VIDEO GMBH
Represented By: Paul A. Lesko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-44
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.