Tatum v. St. Louis Community College et al
| Karen Tatum |
| St. Louis Community College, Nancy R. Simmons, Markus Ahrens, Donna Sneed, George Wasson, Kathleen Dubois, Vernon Kays and Academic Appeals Committee |
| 4:2012cv02218 |
| November 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order.Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on January 16, 2013. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file an amended complaint within than 30 days from the dat e of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. ( Response to Court due by 1/4/2013.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/05/2012. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
