Hall v. State of Missouri

Hall v. State of Missouri

Petitioner:	Arizona Hall
Respondent:	State of Missouri
Case Number:	4:2013cv00178
Filed:	January 25, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	David D. Noce
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2013	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff the forms for filing petitions for writ of habeas corpus under § 2254 and 2241. An Order of Dismissal will be filed herewith. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 03/08/2013. (CBL)
February 7, 2013	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to formally consent, in writing, to the Court's characterization of the instant filing as § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form petitioner for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner consents to the characterization, then hemust file an amended &# 167; 2254 petition on the Court- provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not consent to the characterization of the instant filing as a § 2254motion, or if petitioner fails to timely respond to this Order, then the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice and without characterizing the filing as a § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner submits an amended petition, he must also pay the $5 statutory filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ( Response to Court due by 3/9/2013.) Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/9/2013.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 2/7/13. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2013

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff the forms for filing petitions for writ of habeas corpus under § 2254 and 2241. An Order of Dismissal will be filed herewith. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 03/08/2013. (CBL)

February 7, 2013

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to formally consent, in writing, to the Court's characterization of the instant filing as § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form petitioner for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner consents to the characterization, then hemust file an amended &# 167; 2254 petition on the Court- provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not consent to the characterization of the instant filing as a § 2254motion, or if petitioner fails to timely respond to this Order, then the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice and without characterizing the filing as a § 2254 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner submits an amended petition, he must also pay the $5 statutory filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ( Response to Court due by 3/9/2013.) Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/9/2013.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 2/7/13. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. State of Missouri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Missouri
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Arizona Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?