Hall v. Edwards
| Arizona Hall |
| Lenard Edwards |
| 4:2013cv00556 |
| March 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Terry I. Adelman |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Adelman's Report and Recommendation filed on December 31, 2013 is adopted and sustained in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for the District Judge and Magis trate Judge to Recuse Themselves and Charge of Conspiring with the State of Missouri (#31) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Order Granting Pro Se Status (#29) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Finality of Determination (#37) is DENIED as MOOT.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Petiti oner's Motion for Leave to Supplement Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#38) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered thissame date. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/21/2014. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend Petition (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/6/2013. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward to petitioner the court-provided form for filing a "Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner sha ll complete this form in its entirety and return it to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to complete and return this form within thirty days, the Court will dismiss this acti on without prejudice and without further notice to him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 5/9/2013. (2241 forms forwarded to petitioner). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/9/2013. (JMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Edwards | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lenard Edwards | |
| Represented By: | Stephen D. Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Arizona Hall | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
