Missey v. Bowersox
||David L. Missey
||April 26, 2013
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||Thomas C. Mummert
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 3, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus as time -barred. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Petitioner a form "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support Ha beas Cases." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order either to pay the statutory filing fee of $5 or to submit a completed "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support Habeas Cases." ( Show Cause Response due by 5/30/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 05/03/2013. (CBL)
|September 3, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without further proceedings. [Doc. 1] An Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/3/2013. (NCL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.