Smith v. United Parcel Service et al
Gary T. Smith |
United Parcel Service, Stan Roux and Anthony Taylor |
4:2013cv00965 |
May 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No 53], is granted. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. 53 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/2/15. (CLA) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Gary T. Smith. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a )(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to be issued upon the complaint as to United Parcel Service.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as to defendants Stan Roux and Anthony Taylor, the Clerk shall not issue process o r cause process to be issued, because thecomplaint is legally frivolous and fails to state a claim or cause of action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A separate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/18/13. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.