United Pet Group, Inc. v. John Doe

United Pet Group, Inc. v. John Doe

Plaintiff:	United Pet Group, Inc.
Defendant:	John Doe
Case Number:	4:2013cv01053
Filed:	June 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 31, 2014	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 18 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to recover statutory damages in the sum of $150,000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Permanent Injunction is entered in this case...(Please see attached Memorandum & Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/31/2014. (NEB)
August 20, 2013	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ( PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for leave to take discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 3.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may immedi ately serve Rule 45 subpoenas on Amazon.com and other like entities to obtain information necessary to identify the Doe Defendants herein. The subpoenas shall have a copy of this Memorandum and Order attached. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to serve the subpoenas. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/20/13. (JWJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 31, 2014

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 18 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to recover statutory damages in the sum of $150,000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Permanent Injunction is entered in this case...(Please see attached Memorandum & Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/31/2014. (NEB)

August 20, 2013

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ( PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for leave to take discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 3.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may immedi ately serve Rule 45 subpoenas on Amazon.com and other like entities to obtain information necessary to identify the Doe Defendants herein. The subpoenas shall have a copy of this Memorandum and Order attached. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to serve the subpoenas. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/20/13. (JWJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United Pet Group, Inc. v. John Doe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Pet Group, Inc.
Represented By:	David B. Jinkins
Represented By:	Matthew A. Braunel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?