Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis v. Aarthi S. Rao et al
| Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis |
| Aarthi S. Rao and Manickam Narayanan |
| 4:2013cv01683 |
| August 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A Shaw |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's ex parte Motion for Extension of Time for Service of Complaint is DENIED. [Doc. 14] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process on the defendants. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/24/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for extension of time for service of the complaint is GRANTED. Doc. #12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall obtain service of process upon defendants Rao and Narayanan and file proof of service by March 17, 2014. Failure to comply fully and timely with this Order will result in the dismissal without prejudice of the claims against unserved defendant, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/17/2013. (RAK)
|
| Filing 12 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of: Time for Service of Complaint by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Draper, David) |
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs ex parte motion for an order for substituted service on the defendants is DENIED. Doc. 10 . Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/5/2013. (RAK)
|
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Plaintiff having filed its Amended Complaint in compliance with the Order Concerning Jurisdiction (Doc. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of this matter is vacated. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on September 3, 2013. (SMH)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 Complaint 08/28/2013 Summons(es) issued, , filed by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Draper, David) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER CONCERNING JURISDICTION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by September 3, 2013, plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that alleges facts establishing the citizenship of all parties to this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court.Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 9/3/2013. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/29/2013. (NCL) Modified docket text on 8/29/2013 (NCL).
|
|
Filing 6
Docket Text ORDER re: Doc. #2 , MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David R. Draper, filed by plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam of St. Louis; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on August 29, 2013. (SMH)
|
| Filing 5 CJRA ORDER (jgw). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled case is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III to District Judge Charles A. Shaw for all further proceedings. (CBL) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Manickam Narayanan, Aarthi S. Rao. The summonses were emailed to david@thedraperfirm.com. (DLT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam Process Server: Rachel Caldwell (DLT) |
| Receipt 4644037694 in the amount of $100.00 for PRO HAC VICE on behalf of The Draper Law Firm (CCAM) |
| Receipt 4644037695 in the amount of $400.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE on behalf of The Draper Law Firm (CCAM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice David R. Draper. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100) by Plaintiff Nithyananda Dhanapeetam. (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing)(MCB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Manickam Narayanan & Aarthi S. Rao. Paid $400.00 filing fees on 08/27/2017. Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Nithyananda Dhanapeetam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Original filing form)(DLT). |
| Case Opening Notification, no summonses issued at this time, due to no summonses filed with case opening. Attorney shall file summonses and Notice of Process Server with court so service may be issued. Consents to magistrate Judge to be filed by all parties., Disclosure of Corporate Interest to be filed by all corporations.. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert. (DLT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
