Flynn v. Ascension Health Long Term Disability Plan et al
Debra Flynn |
Ascension Health Long Term Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc. |
4:2013cv02449 |
December 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Henry E. Autrey |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs, [Doc. No. 72 ], is Denied. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 01/22/2016. (CLK) |
Filing 71 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 58] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 61] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to Defendant Sedgwick to reopen the administrative record for the limited purpose discussed herein. 58 61 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/20/15. (CLA) |
Filing 52 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, [Doc. No. 39 ] is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for a hearing is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/23/2014. (CLK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.