Bertelsen v. Grant et al
Plaintiff: Ralph Richard Bertelsen
Defendant: Monsanto
Case Number: 4:2014cv00659
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside Home State
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Monsanto Company's Motion to Dismiss 26 is GRANTED and this case is dismissed without prejudice.Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/8/14. (ARL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bertelsen v. Grant et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph Richard Bertelsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto
Represented By: Daniel C. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?