Rolwes Company v. Barnes et al
| Rolwes Company |
| Lisa L Barnes, Larry G Barnes and K.A.B. Construction Company, L.L.C. |
| 4:2014cv01045 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John A. Ross |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Rolwes Company's Motion to Modify Preliminary Injunction Order 56 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/2/14. (JWD)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED, IN PART, AND DENIED, IN PART, and that, upon receiving notice of this Order, Defendants, their officers, directors, managers, agents, s ervants, employees, attorneys and all persons acting in concert or participating with Defendants (hereinafter collectively referred to as Defendants) are hereby enjoined and restrained: see order for details....IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the par ties shall submit a Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan, providing proposed dates for all items set forth i n Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(3), within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. The parties joint proposed scheduling plan must include a proposed date for mediation of Plaintiffs claims.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/25/14. (JWD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
