Level One Technologies, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al
Plaintiff: Level One Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and Penske Logistics, LLC
Case Number: 4:2014cv01305
Filed: July 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 289 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Level Ones motion to exclude certain portions of Hoffmans testimony, [No 241], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Opinion 3.2.3 will be excluded because it has no probative value. Fed. R. Evid. 402. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/18/18. (KJS)
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 288 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Penskes motion for summary judgment, 185 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/25/18. (KEK)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 276 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Penskes Motion in Limine to Exclude Non-Disclosed Evidence and Testimony, [No. 236 ], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Penske may seek to introduce the evidence and testimony in question at trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that iGate and Penske must produce the monthly registers in question as well as Rajasekarans spreadsheet. iGate and Penske also must make Rajasekaran available for deposition on the subject of the spreadsheet, the monthly registers, and any other time records in question. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/10/18. (KJS)
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 273 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Penske's motion to exclude Dr. Rosenbergs testimony, No. 178 , is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Penske's motion to exclude Taylors testimony, No. 182 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED i n part. Taylor's Opinion 1 and Opinion 3 shall be excluded from trial because they pertain to the dismissed lost volume and unjust enrichment claims, respectively. Penske's motion to exclude, No. 182 , is denied to the extent that it seeks to exclude Taylor's Opinion 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Level One's consent motion to dismiss Count V, No. 265 , is GRANTED. Penske's motion to dismiss Count V with prejudice, No. 254 , and Level Ones motion to amend, No. 257 , are accordingly DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/16/18. (ARL)
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 268 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Penske's motion for summary judgment, [No. 130], is GRANTED in part. Upon revisiting the matter, Level One's unjust enrichment claim (Count VI) is DISMISSED.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 5/14/18. (LGK)
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 197 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Penskes Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 130 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Subparagraphs 101(a), 101(b), 101(c), and 101(g) of Count I of Level Ones Second Amended Complaint are dismisse d with prejudice. Counts II, III, and IV of Level Ones Second Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Level One shall file an amended complaint no later than February 23, 2018. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/25/18. (ARL)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Level One Technologies, Inc.'s motion for reconsideration # 26 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this Order and the Court's March 20, 2015 Order no later than April 27, 2015. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/17/15. (JWD)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case and for a More Definite Statement # 11 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counts I, II, IV, V, X, and XII are dismissed with prejudice. Count VI is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this Order no later than April 10, 2015. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/20/15. (JWD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Level One Technologies, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Level One Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Charles S. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Represented By: Douglas Y. Christian
Represented By: Jonathan Ryan Shulan
Represented By: Brittany Marie Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penske Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Douglas Y. Christian
Represented By: Jonathan Ryan Shulan
Represented By: Brittany Marie Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?