Proby v. Bullock et al
| George Proby, Jr. |
| D. R. Bullock, Christy Ramsey, Unknown Jones, Andrew Rieger, Zerick Hahn, St. Francois County Jail Administrator, Kevin Chase, Yolandis Patterson, Wanda Laramore, Unknown Khengor, Jay Cassady, Paul Gore, Unknown Dittman, Alan Earls and Lloyd Hodges |
| 4:2014cv01355 |
| August 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Cole |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motions for appointment of counsel [Doc. #71] are DENIEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE. 71 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/16/15. (CLA) (Main Document 83 replaced on 11/16/2015) (CLA).
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. # 54 ] is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/26/15. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2015, plaintiff shall provide the Court with the full name and address of defendant Christy Ramsey so that service may be effected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action as to Christy Ramsey, without prejudice andwithout further notice. Response to Court due by 3/14/2015. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/17/15. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. # 35 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 01/09/2015. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 4 ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/8/14. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $37.60 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Or der. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an origi nal proceeding. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's official-capaci ty claims and claims against"St. Francois County Jail Administrator" are DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall otherwise issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 11/2/2014.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/02/2014. (CLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
