Tate v. Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, Inc. et al
Robert Tate |
Zebulan Boomgaarden and Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, Inc. |
4:2014cv01534 |
September 8, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Ronnie L. White |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, Missouri, from which it was removed. An Order of Remand accompanies this Order. re: 17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to State Court filed by Plaintiff Robert Tate Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/23/14. (JWJ) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Defendant Boomgaarden's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13 ) is GRANTED in part . Plaintiff shall file a response in opposition no later than October 20, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Substitute Defendants no later than October 20, 2014. ( Response to Court due by 10/20/2014.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/26/2014. (NEB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.