Drake et al v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
| Sandra Drake and Randy Smith |
| Steak N Shake Operations, Inc. |
| 4:2014cv01535 |
| September 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John A. Ross |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
352
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter Judgment (Doc. 336 ), is GRANTED in part. An amended judgment will be filed separately.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/10/19. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
279
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.'s ("SnS") Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert (Doc. 251 ), is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/25/19. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
278
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 272 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/15/2019. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
269
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 245 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/10/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
239
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 158 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/28/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
230
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Katrina Wolfshoefer (Doc. 174 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, no later than Friday, September 7, 2018, file their response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 158 ). Defendant shall, no later than Wednesday, September 12, 2018, file any reply. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/5/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 223 ), is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are prohibited from deposing Sardar Biglari absent further leave from the Court. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/30/18. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
204
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall, no later than Friday, June 29, 2018, file with the Court its alternative trial plan and identify all persons it intends to call as witnesses at trial. Plaintiffs are entitled to depose any fact witness Defendant identifies whom it has not already deposed. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/10/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
198
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall supplement their trial plan (Doc. 117 ), no later than May 4, 2018, to include the identity of all persons they intend to call as witnesses at trial. SnS is entitled to depose any fact witness Plaintiff identifies whom it has not already deposed. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/1/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Rule 23 Certification (Doc. 130) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Decertification of the Conditionally Certified FLSA Collective (Doc. 134) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, the parties shall file a joint proposed schedule for the remainder of the litigation, including a proposed trial date. 130 134 ( Response to Court due by 1/22/2018.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/22/17. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation on Conditional Certification (Doc. 36) is GRANTED. The Court conditionally certifies the following classes: 1) With respect to Count I: Current and former Managers employed in Defendants St. Louis Group Market who worked for Defendant three years from the date of this Order to the present. 2) With Respect to Count III: Current and former female Managers employed in Defendants St. Louis Group Market who worked for Defenda nt three years from the date of this Order to the present. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of Class Notice (Doc. 37) is GRANTED. The Notice filed as an exhibit to the Motion (Doc. 37- 2), excluding the highlighted sentence , shall serve as the Notice in this case. The Consent Form also attached to the Motion as an exhibit (Doc. 37-1) shall serve as the Consent Form in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs counsel the last known names and mailing addresses for all individuals who are to receive the Notice within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/17/2015. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Steak N Shake Operations, Inc. motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Rule 16 conference will be set by separate order.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/17/15. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Submit Previously Filed Notice of Supplemental Authority by Plaintiffs (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Supplemental Authority Notice of Plaintiffs (Doc. 17) is DENIED as moot.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/26/14. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
