Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. RDB Universal Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 58, Gregg Smith, Painters District Council No. 2 Pension Trust, Painters District Council No. 2 Welfare Trust, Painters District Council No. 2 Vacation Trust, Painters District Council No. 2 Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust, David Doerr, Rich Lucks, William Boevingloh, Carl Farrell, Donald Thomas, Daniel Weinstroer, Michael Smith, Daniel Hanson, Steve Phillipp, Jr., Mark Borgmann, Michael Slattery, Joseph Keipp, Tim Weis and Fred Phillipp, Jr.
Defendant: RDB Universal Services, LLC, Deloris Berry and Relder Berry
Case Number: 4:2014cv01812
Filed: October 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 155 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [ECF No. 151 ] against Deloris Berry, n/k/a Deloris Seaton, and BV Diversified Consultants, LLC. is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 1/24/2020. (JMP)
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 126 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [ECF No. 113 ] is GRANTED and Plaintiffs shall be awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $75,965.45 and costs in the amount of $2,417.26. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/14/17. (EAB)
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment shall be entered on behalf of Plaintiffs and against Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC, as follows; IT IS ORDERED that Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC shall pay Plaintiffs $2 71,271.69; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall inform the Court within twenty days of this order whether they wish to dismiss this action against Defendants Deloris and Relder Berry or proceed in a different manner; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC shall pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs, the amount to be determined by the Court after Plaintiff has filed appropriate supporting documents.An Order of Judgment will be issued together with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on May 24, 2017. (MCB)
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 86 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and to Clarify Court's Order Granting and Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in Part [ECF No. 71 ] is hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, on the issue of the specific CBA in effect does not affect Defendants liability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsiderat ion, on the issue of a renewed audit by Plaintiffs is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, on whether Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted or denied with respect to Defendants' claims of tortious interference of contract or business expectancy and breach of contract is GRANTED [ECF No. 71], and after reconsideration, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Defendants' claims of tortious interfere nce of contract or business expectancy and breach of contract. [ECF No. 48]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, with respect to Summary Judgment of RDB's counterclaim of money had and received is GRANTED [ECF No. 71], and after reconsideration, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to RDB's counterclaim of money had and received. [ECF No. 48]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/16/2016. (CBL)
April 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in part. [ECF No. 48 ].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, on the issue of whether Defendant RDB Universal is bound to a Collective Bargaining Agreement as explained in the above memorandum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, finding Defendants Deloris Ber ry and Relder Berry are bound as individuals through the terms of the Guaranty referenced in the above memorandum. [ECF No. 49-13].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants counterclaims of tortious int erference and breach of contract are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Defendants' Relder Berry and Deloris Berry counterclaims of money had and received, and DENIED for Defendant RDB Univer sals counterclaim of money had and received. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in all other respects relating to their claims is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Demand for a Trial by Jury is hereby DENIED. [ECF No. 34 ]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 4/6/16. (EAB)
September 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim or for a more definitive statement [ECF No. 38 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an answer or other responsive pleadings to Defendants' counterclaims within ten (10) days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/17/2015. (CBL)
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' "Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim" [ECF No. 33 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file an Answer to the counterclaims within twenty days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 07/15/2015. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. RDB Universal Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 58
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregg Smith
Represented By: James P. Faul
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 2 Pension Trust
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 2 Welfare Trust
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 2 Vacation Trust
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Painters District Council No. 2 Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Doerr
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rich Lucks
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Boevingloh
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Farrell
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Thomas
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Weinstroer
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Smith
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Hanson
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Phillipp, Jr.
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Borgmann
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Slattery
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Keipp
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tim Weis
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Phillipp, Jr.
Represented By: James P. Faul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RDB Universal Services, LLC
Represented By: Craig J. Concannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deloris Berry
Represented By: Craig J. Concannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Relder Berry
Represented By: Craig J. Concannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?