Thomas v. AT&T et al
Marnice R. Thomas |
Pamela Nash and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company |
4:2014cv01993 |
December 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
E. Richard Webber |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Bill of Costs [ECF No. 47] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on October 24, 2016. (MCB) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Entered in the Above Matter [ECF No. 48 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/8/16. (EAB) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 30 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/9/2016. (CBL) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Nash's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 3 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Marness Thomas's claims against Defendant Pamela Nash are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 3/17/15. (EAB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.