Severance v. Waffeoffe et al
Plaintiff: David A. Severance
Defendant: Unknown Waffeoffe, Unknown Bradshaw, Unknown Gaddy, Terry Russell, Seargeon Payaillia and George Lombardi
Case Number: 4:2015cv00074
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Francois
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 230 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff David A. Severance's Motion for Reimbursement of Out-of-Pocket Expenses is GRANTED in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($1529 .50) for out-of-pocket expenses. [Doc. 222] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court disburse the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($1529.50) from the Non-Appropriated Fund,payable to Armstrong T easdale LLP, with payment mailed to:Armstrong Teasdale LLP Attn: Patrick J. Kenny, Esq. 7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800 St. Louis, Missouri 63105. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward plaintiff's request for reimbursement of expenses in excess of $5,000 to the chairperson of the Non-Appropriated Fund Committee along with a copy of this Memorandum and Order, recommending that the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) be paid to Dr. Shall for his services in this case. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/4/2018. (MRC)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 228 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Dr. Ernest Jackson's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 203]. An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this memorandum and order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/20/2018. (MRC)
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 225 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff David A. Severance's motion to exclude expert testimony of Dr. Allen Sclaroff is DENIED. [Doc. 187] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff David A. Severance's mo tion to exclude expert testimony of Dr. Kennon Tubbs is DENIED. [Doc. 185] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by Wednesday, December 5, 2018, defendant Ernest Jackson, through counsel, shall submit to plaintiff's counsel a list of all cases in which Dr. Allen Sclaroff testified as an expert at trial or by deposition during the previous four years. If defendant fails to comply timely and fully with this Order, plaintiff is directed to file a Status Report with the Court, and the Court will exclude Dr. Sclaroff's expert testimony. ( Response to Court due by 12/5/2018.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/15/2018. (MRC)
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 170 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Proposed Budgets for Court Appointed Experts Without Consent of All Parties, or Alternative Motion for Clarification of Prior Orders and a Third Ex tension of Time to File Joint Budgets is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 159] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Trial Setting and Amended Case Management Order is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 164] IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that plaintiff shall disclose any expert witnesses by April 26, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by May 10, 2018, the parties shall file a joint motion to modify the Case Management Order with agreed-upon dates. ( Response to Court due by 5/10/2018.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/12/2018. (MRC)
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of expert witnesses by the Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall have thirty days from the date of this order to nominate expert witnesses as set out above.[Doc. 104 ] ( Response to Court due by 9/30/2017.) Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/31/17. (JWD)
November 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct discovery prior to Rule 16 conference is GRANTED. [Doc. 35]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to promptly ascertai n through appropriate discovery the identity of the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1). Upon learning the identity of the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants, plaintiff may then properly seek leave of Court to amend his comp laint to add them as a parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a status report regarding his progress in identifying the John Doe and Jane Doe defendants within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. ( Response to Court due by 12/6/2015.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/6/2015. (MRC)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Patrick J. Kenny, of Armstrong Teasdale, 7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800, St. Louis, Missouri 63105, telephone number (314) 621-5070, is hereby appointed as counsel for the plaintiff. Couns el shall have thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the Court file in which to file an amended complaint if deemed appropriate.....IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide appointed counsel with a copy of the complete Court file.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/31/2015. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Severance v. Waffeoffe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David A. Severance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Waffeoffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Gaddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seargeon Payaillia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Lombardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?