Jackson v. Asplundh Construction Corp. et al.
| Susan E. Jackson |
| Asplundh Construction Corp. and Anthony Michael Rogers |
| 4:2015cv00714 |
| May 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Washington |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Defendant Anthony Rogers' Prior Criminal Conviction or Sex Offender Status [ECF No. 76 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIE D, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude "Reptile Theory" Argument or Evidence [ECF No. 77 ] is held in abeyance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude Willia m Hampton's Hearsay Testimony on Conversations and Site Visit with Potosi Police Chief Roy Logsden [ECF No. 80 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Consolidated Motions in Limine [ECF No. [ 81 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions in Limine [ECF No. 84 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Punitive Damages at Trial [ECF No. 68 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that and Defendants' Motion in Limine Requesting Exclusion or in the Alternative Limiting of Plaintiff's Testimony of Injury and Causation by Virtue of the "Sudden Onset" Doctrine [ECF No. 92 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/13/16. (EAB)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Designation of William E. Hampton as an Expert is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. [ECF No. 43 ]; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff&# 039;s expert is prohibited from opinion testimony that Defendants' violated federal laws or regulations and is prohibited from opining on the ultimate issue in this case on the basis of Defendant Rogerss vision. [ECF No. 43 ]; IT IS FURTHER OR DERED Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert Francis Oldham is DENIED. [ECF No. 56 ]; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Opinions 1-7 of Defendants' Expert Stephen Chewning is DENIED. [ECF No. 58 ]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/8/2016. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
